When the government created AFUE (Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency) ratings, they had a good plan. They intended to help consumers understand differences in the efficiency of heating systems with a rating system that showed the percentage of fuel that is actually converted to useful heat.
However, AFUE ratings don’t help consumers make educated decisions about many hot water heating systems’ efficiency because it does not apply to combination heat and hot water boilers and it only measures some chimney related losses. It’s like saying highway driving is the miles per gallon you’ll get all year when you know you’ll be doing most of your driving around town. Analysis of a Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) study confirms that the top performing combination heat and hot water boilers can deliver savings of over 40% compared to other boilers with comparable AFUE ratings. BNL is one of the U.S. Department of Energy Laboratories, located on Long Island New York, and has done considerable R&D work on heating systems.
AFUE is the prescribed method for heat only boilers, although it is not much different than combustion efficiency which measures stack related losses. Typical combination boiler annual efficiency is routinely much lower than AFUE or combustion efficiency, especially for cast iron boilers or boilers with high “mass” and less than 2” of insulation, and for boilers that finish above 120°F when the thermostat is satisfied (AFUE rates boilers with a 120°F return temperature, but they typically run with a 160°F return and 180°F supply). Substantial losses occur because heating a 400 to 600 pound boiler to 180°F may take 8 to 15 minutes just to heat the boiler itself, and if that energy cannot be used before it dissipates, then the fuel used to heat the boiler is wasted. That energy left wasted in the boiler is called “idle loss,” and it can lower boiler annual efficiency by 15% to 40% below its heat only AFUE rating. With combination boilers this is a particular concern during the summer when these units are in hot standby mode for long time periods. Further losses drop the real efficiency even lower. These occur from draft hoods and draft regulators that suck heat out of the building, heat left wasted in the distribution piping, and maintaining temperature by heating the boiler up to 180°F 3 to 5 times a day to replenish a hot water tank – even in the summer.
Efficient combination boilers perform much more closely to their rated AFUE. Characteristics of efficient boilers include low mass and low water content (for example not cast iron), 2″ or more of boiler insulation, a well-insulated hot water tank, no draft regulator or draft hood, and an effectively integrated heat and hot water energy saving control. The most effective energy saving control in the Brookhaven National Lab study was found to be the thermal purge control, which must be combined with a low mass non-cast iron boiler to be effective and virtually eliminate idle losses. Also look for combined heat and hot water systems with an external plate heat exchanger for hot water as these are more efficient and produce more hot water than tanks with coils. Other characteristics to watch out for include boilers with coils that make hot water called tankless coil boilers as these maintain high temperatures and are the least efficient.
The chart below shows types of boilers and annual efficiency from the Brookhaven National Laboratory study to help identify better performing heating systems. Top performing characteristics feature a heavily insulated low mass boiler, a well insulated hot water storage tank heated with a plate heat exchanger, and an integrated thermal purge control for both heating and hot water zones. For example, the well insulated low mass boiler with thermal purge anticipates the end of the heat call and pumps the heat left in the boiler out to the hot water tank or a heating zone to capture energy that would otherwise be wasted. The result is very high annual efficiency, even in the spring, summer, and fall when boilers run much less frequently.
Combined or Integrated Hydronic Heating Systems are typically boilers that provide both heat and hot water. The analysis of “Performance of Integrated Hydronic Heating Systems” study shows Energy Kinetics low mass thermal purge design is more efficient than the 95 AFUE modulating condensing boiler and all other condensing and non-condensing boilers and systems tested. Energy Kinetics is the only manufacturer of low mass thermal purge boilers with the characteristics identified in the study.
The above chart shows the analysis of Brookhaven National Labs studies1 for annual efficiency of combined heat and hot water systems. AFUE much more closely represents peak efficiency, and the energy wasted when the boiler shuts off really cuts down the annual efficiency. Comparing the 83.5% AFUE tankless coil boiler at right, Energy Kinetics boilers with top performing design characteristics like System 2000 will cut fuel bills by over 43%…although there is only a 4% difference in heat only AFUE ratings. This means the tankless coil boiler will burn 77% more energy than System 2000.
All of Energy Kinetics high efficiency boilers, including Accel CS, the non-condensing Resolute, and System 2000 incorporate the top performing design strategies identified in the study are shown to be more efficient than the other 95% AFUE modulating condensing boiler and all boilers in the study. Notice the very small difference between AFUE and annual efficiency for all of Energy Kinetics top performing low mass / thermal purge boilers. Compare that to losses for all other boilers which will have 14% to 73% higher fuel bills than their heat only AFUE ratings indicate.
How is this possible? Energy Kinetics pioneered low mass technology with thermal purge, and has perfected it over 40+ years. Our design heats up in just a few minutes, heats your home or hot water, and then runs a thermal purge that puts energy remaining in the boiler to work heating your home or hot water. There’s no energy left wasted in the boiler.
We specifically designed System 2000, Resolute, and Accel CS to virtually eliminate the energy losses found in all other boilers, losses that are NOT measured by AFUE. To make the highest efficiency boilers, we combine the best technology: our unique well insulated low mass boilers, our high performance hot water system, and our Hybrid Energy Recovery (thermal purge) control. This delivers unsurpassed comfort and the lowest fuel bills.
Click here to estimate your savings from various heating systems.
Savings with low mass/thermal purge boilers are shown to be much greater than with comparably rated heat and hot water systems. The top performing design features incorporated in System 2000 had the highest annual efficiency in the study – even better than the 95% AFUE boiler tested.
What many homeowners, business owners and heating professionals don’t know about AFUE increases heating bills and wastes energy. The bar graph below compares AFUE ratings to the real efficiency delivered for space heating and water heating over the course of a year. Be sure to take a look to get a better understanding of real efficiency to cut your fuel bills.
Real Fuel Efficiencies
Shown below are comparisons of fuel efficiencies among typical and top rated available home heat and hot water systems.
This chart summarizes analysis of findings in Brookhaven National Labs studies.1 The large yellow numbers indicate efficiencies.
[ Read More]
The industry’s preeminent heating, air conditioning and refrigeration engineering society, ASHRAE, has published “Performance of Combination Hydronic Systems” by Thomas Butcher, PhD, as the December 2011 cover story in the ASHRAE Journal. This article highlights the deep energy saving potential possible with an upgrade to the top performing combination heat and hot water systems compared to typical boiler systems.
Energy Kinetics has always been focused on delivering the best efficiency, and our boilers use the integrated design characteristics which stood out in the study with the highest annual efficiency and the lowest idle loss (0.15%). System 2000’s unique thermal purge control strategy, low mass design, and high performance water heating system are identified in the top rating, and virtually eliminate the effects of oversizing. The next best system in the study had an idle loss four times higher, which resulted in higher annual fuel use and significantly lower efficiency during hot water production.
In this multi-year study, the U.S. Coast Guard in Kodiak, Alaska, replaced (24) new 85% and 86% AFUE cast iron boilers of various makes, indirect water heaters, and electric water heaters with System 2000 in residences.
The tremendous savings led to the 2007 replacement of another (149) cast iron boilers as part of a Super Energy Saving Performance Contract (Super ESPC) which is run by the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). This project capitalizes on the expertise and financing of the ESPC contractor to assist the Coast Guard in complying with an Executive Order which required all Government agencies to reduce their energy use by 20% by 2015. The Coast Guard also realized operations and maintenance savings with System 2000 over the cast iron models. The FEMP takes advantage of real efficiency over AFUE, and you can too!
[ Read Looking Ahead in First Regional Super ESPC: Success on Kodiak Island, Alaska]
Analysis of Brookhaven National Laboratory study uncovers a need to retool boiler energy efficiency rating programs.
[ View Summary] or [ View Report ] What are Department of Energy National Laboratories?
[ Find Out More ]
AFUE (government efficiency) ratings can be off by 25% or more, an error that can underestimate fuel consumption by up to 47% when applied to combination systems.
The study shows that a consumer who purchases a home heating system based only on a comparison of AFUE ratings may actually spend as much as $1,200 per year more on fuel with one system, compared to a second system with a nearly identical AFUE rating. This difference in real annual efficiency is determined by a characteristic of all heating systems called idle loss, a performance factor which is not evaluated for AFUE on units which provide both heat and hot water. Idle loss includes two primary areas of heat loss on conventional home heating systems: standby loss, and jacket loss. Also almost entirely neglected are draft regulator, draft hood, and room air losses.
In the study, the reduction of idle losses is identified as a primary factor in improving real system efficiency.
Only when idle losses are reduced or eliminated is it possible for annual combination system efficiency to approach the AFUE rating of a heating product. In fact, significant idle losses may lead to actual efficiencies as low as 53%. This real annual efficiency rating may determine system performance even when the government AFUE rating measures in the 80-95 percentile range.
The study also reports that the cold start and cold finish operation used in Energy Kinetics’ System 2000 has the lowest overall idle loss and the best annual efficiency performance among all home heating systems tested to date, including 95% AFUE condensing gas and oil systems.
The study revealed that outdoor reset controls may save 5% to 15%, but need trial and error adjustments over the course of a heating season. By comparison, using proven Hybrid Energy Recovery® (thermal purge) System 2000 automatically adapts to heating loads. The result is a home heating system that delivers the best documented efficiency. View our efficiency checklist to see how your heating system idle loss compares.
[ View Checklist ]
AFUE ratings don’t help consumers make educated decisions about a boiler heating system’s efficiency.
[ View Article ]
There are several different kinds of boiler controls available. Here is a brief overview of the performance and efficiency benefits:
How do low-efficiency boiler controls artificially boost AFUE ratings and undermine efficiency?
[ Read More ]
Find out more about conservation and about the impact of saving energy and about renewable energy.
[ View Sustainables ]
The chart at left is created from source data from the Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Forms EIA-457 A-G of the 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey, New England and Mid-Atlantic states. Air conditioning percentage is an aggregate for the region and may not be representative of specific home usage.